是日的麵：本季新番

這季羊看的新番的OP和ED同讓羊飛躍起來了
首先海貓的ED是Jimang~OP也很不錯,很喜歡這種唱腔
化物語的ED是supercell,唱者是やなぎなぎ
羊聽過的やなぎなぎ的vocal是兩首的東方vocal曲
雖然量不多但有在意那治療感覺的歌詞
翻查了一下發現她曾在nico上活動但已退出了
海貓那個本來只想看而不去看討論,
因為想試試不被捏
但還是因為好奇所以XD
反正可當補完劇情
化物語的那個,羊是新房迷~就是喜歡風格
提一下BGM感覺也很好.啊話說OP有guro畫面

是日的麵：Utawarerumono OVA 1

有人說這個節奏太慢了但羊覺得還可以,
雖然有些畫面好像有停太久的感覺
畫風羊覺得跟TV版都各有所長有人的○量好像不太對?是形狀問題
oboro好像突然變強了?TV版裡的不怎強但遊戲裡是最好用的角色之一啊
那個相隔兩三年部分聲優抓不住原來的感覺了(請節哀順變
看ED時才知道以前已聽過benawi裡面的人的聲音了

是日的麵：[歌詞(!?)翻譯]最/終/鬼/畜/弟/Pasta I
此乃有遺漏版,因為部分聽取不到,有待日後更正
註:
1.Pasta在作為音效時仍是Pasta,有內容的則翻作意式麵
2.名不方便翻
3.符號都是沿用字幕的

以下開始不正常是歌詞(!?)

伊：Pasta～☆Pasta～☆Pasta～☆什麼？
子伊：什麼？什麼？
（吸吮吸吮吸吮吸吮）
米：總之我就是英雄！！
（咕咕咕咕咕咕咕咕咕）
独：造布穀鳥鐘造布穀鳥鐘造布穀鳥鐘！造布穀鳥鐘！！
ロ：嗚～～↑嗚～～↓嗚～～↑嗚～～↓是フ/ラ/ン/ス！保護我！你這個混帳！！
伊：我有親戚住在巴伐利亞↑嗚↓（我）什麼也會做

伊：Pa☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pasta☆
伊：我是蕃茄箱的妖精...
独：露出真面目吧！！
伊：ド/イ/ツぅ　ド/イ/ツ　ドイ　ドィド　ド/イ/ツぅー　你認識ロ/ー/マ爺爺嗎？
独：嗯
伊：Yahoo↓★
伊：Pa☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pasta☆
子伊：正餐有意式麵嗎?
墺：＼沒有／
伊：Pa↓Pa↑Pasta☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pasta☆

西：要吃油條☆油條☆嗎？
子伊：ve-▼ve-▼ve-▼
伊：要吃Pizza☆Pizza☆嗎？
子伊：ve～,ve～,ve～
伊：要吃意式麵☆意式麵☆嗎？
子伊：ve～ve～ve～∇
西：要吃那個人做的菜嗎？
子伊：不要！不要！不要！
英：是嗎 我做的cccc菜  難吃嗎
墺：我現在就用鋼琴來表現我的憤怒
（♪♪♪♪♪♪♪　♪♪♪♪♪♪♪）
独：你的憤怒是蕭邦嗎...

伊：ド/イ/ツ是ドS啊 家裡有很多重口味的書和DVD
独：像這樣的拷問與我的書↑比起來就只是蚊咬的程序而且！

貓:喵♪
子伊：咦？
貓:喵♪
子伊：咦？
貓:喵♪
子伊：嘻♪
貓:喵♪
子伊：嘻♪
貓,子伊: 哇～～(花)

(仏:哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈...)
墺：這,這,這,這位笨蛋先生！

伊：Pa☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pasta☆
ロ：剛才踐到兔屎全都是你的錯！！
伊：Pa☆Pa☆Pa☆Pa☆Pa☆Pa☆Pa☆Pasta☆
伊：Pa→Pa↓Pa→Pa↑　Pa　ppppp Pa Pa Pasta～～～～～

米：我們也要來做！
英,中,仏:咦？什麼？
米：營火會
英：燒毀成～火焰～ 每一個角落都是那ー業火♪
米：變成召喚惡魔的氣氛了！

伊：我從ド/イ/ツ那兒聽說了 小型化很棒呢～☆ 把我也小型化吧☆
日：不好意思... 小型化的イ/タ/リ/ア人...
伊：喂 我也要 小型化 喂 我也要 小型化 喂 我也 喂 小型化...
日：準備了十二種顏色 會配合季節發行新顏色 順帶一提 我是人氣聲優 完全復活☆perfect☆赤裸裸的に/ほ/ん

HRE：イ,イ,イタ/リ/ア在我家住！！哇！哇！啊哈哈哈哈哈▼啊哈哈哈哈▼
子伊：HRE很可怕...
伊：Pa↓Pa↑Pasta☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pasta☆
中：我做了零嘴兒！零嘴兒！拿去吧
HRE,子伊：yeah(花)

伊：Pa Pa Pasta☆ Pa Pasta Pasta～～☆

伊：ド/イ/ツ！ド/イ/ツ！
独：誒誒誒誒誒誒？
伊：ド/イ/ツ踐到兔屎時我會去幫忙啊☆
伊：Pa☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pa☆Pasta☆Pasta☆

英：準備好吃的菜，可愛的女孩和足球...
伊：這很麻煩！！
伊：Pa↓Pa↑Pasta☆　Pa　Pasta　Pasta～～☆
伊：Pa→Pa↓Pa→Pa↑　Pa　ppppppppp　Pa　Pasta～～～～～

ロ：我被騙了！！
日：我會妥善處理的.下次會的.我會考慮的.☆赤裸裸☆答覆全都是"不"
伊：這菜很難吃
伊：意式麵,Pizza,意式麵,意式麵,Pizza和意式麵
伊：超喜歡捆綁☆
独：是這樣嗎！！！！！！

...ヘ/タ/リ/ア. (^し^)

是日的麵：閱讀近況 29/6/2009

最近讀了鏡家系列1-3(香港公共圖書館只有這幾本Orz),
次序是2->1->3
頭兩本的後面開始有種怎麼突然超現實起來的感覺......
第二本有bug啊,
MOS Burger在一九九八年才在北海道開分店,
但故事發生時間是一九九六年,
但其實也不影響故事
還有手提電話的問題,
但這是不到bug的情況,
是有點怪就是了
讀完了第一二本的時候,
想起了之前伊坂的LushLife的那個有關結局的種種

是日的麵：有感而發！和dA(箱子店2)裡的是同一篇

Opinions about the colouring tools used at school

I have just finished uploading the work to the contest "The Everlasting Summer". I tried to make use of colouring tools which have not been used for a long time. One is crayon. I don't think I have used crayons since I was in kindergarten. I remember that the crayons that I use this time are the free gifts given by a children magazine which stopped publishing a long long time ago.

I don't know why kindergarten and primary school teachers restrain the choice of colouring tools used in art lessons. When we are in kindergarten, we are only allowed to use crayons, in junior primary school, pastels, and in senior secondary school, poster colour.
While I was in kindergarten, when the school term ends we can bring the crayons back home. And while I was in primary school, we must buy a box of pastels and poster colour at the start of every school term, even though there were leftovers from the previous school term. Now at my home, there are still many boxes of poster colour of which some are brand new.

I think school children should be exposed to different kinds of colouring tools. Different tools require different skills teachers should allow children to learn more. They don't have to be very skillful at using every tool but at least they should let them try. It contradicts the aim of learning if students' opportunities are restrained. Some people may think the students can try by themselves, not at school, but students may not be afford to buy different tools just to try out. Also students are busy after school nowadays, so why won't let them try during lessons?

Perhaps the restrictions set by teachers are for easier assessment, i.e. it is easier to assess and compare when every one is using the same tool. However, I believe the purpose of including art lessons in the school curriculum is to develop students' creativity, help them express themselves and foster their ability to appreciate and concentrate and so on, but by adding such restriction the students are actually exploited, without anyone noticing it.

The resource of a school may be a cause to the problem. As mentioned, students may not have enough money to buying different tools, so the school should provide the tools. In addition to greater expenditure by the school, storage is also a problem as many classrooms here in Hong Kong are so small. (This might not be the case now as the birthrate has been dropping, but the with the implementation of smaller classes there may be a problem of lack of space again.)

Finally, I hope more resources could be allocated for art in primary education and teachers nowadays can be more flexible, for the sake of our children.